Fine if it stays at the top.
I think you could remove that [Menu] tab at the top, though, as it's pretty obviously a menu :p
Post Posted: 10 Dec 2011, 21:12
Post Posted: 10 Dec 2011, 21:13
Post Posted: 10 Dec 2011, 21:32
Post Posted: 10 Dec 2011, 23:59
Waffnuffly wrote:I think you could remove that [Menu] tab at the top, though, as it's pretty obviously a menu :p
Post Posted: 11 Dec 2011, 01:28
Post Posted: 15 Dec 2011, 00:28
Post Posted: 15 Dec 2011, 15:15
Post Posted: 15 Dec 2011, 15:21
Code: Select all
<!--[if IE]>
<script src="http://html5shiv.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/html5.js"></script>
<![endif]-->
Code: Select all
/* HTML5 tags */
article, aside, details, figcaption, figure, footer, header, hgroup, nav, section { display: block; }
audio, canvas, video { display: inline-block; *display: inline; *zoom: 1; }
audio:not([controls]) { display: none; }
[hidden] { display: none; }
Post Posted: 15 Dec 2011, 22:24
Post Posted: 15 Dec 2011, 22:36
Post Posted: 15 Dec 2011, 23:32
sana wrote:Query: What do you think about text readability in the new design? Is it fine? As you can see, the old UnrealSP page uses a dark grey color for the background scanlines, which may make the white text easier to read, while I've gone with pure black for the new design... does the contrast hurt the eyes too much?
Post Posted: 15 Dec 2011, 23:42
Post Posted: 15 Dec 2011, 23:49
Jet v4.3.5 wrote:Unless you just have to have it, then I'd say yes, it hurts my eyes a lot more than the subtle look of the old design. Back-of-the-eyes sort of pain thing from straining. And additionally, the scanlines always felt very nice and solid in the design. If you can't have them in the new version, that's understandable, but if you can, I'd suggest them.
Raven wrote:Everything's fine. Once you finish design, I'd need few weeks (due to job and many other works) to implement CMS. I'll add automatic detraction of backgrounds. You'll just have to upload it. Beside it better google bot support, caching and other optimization's. Trust me - I'm doing that shit long time.
Post Posted: 16 Dec 2011, 09:39
sana wrote:If we do another collection of background images, I'll have to enforce higher quality standards, because 1024x768/800x600 screenshots with jaggies just aren't quite sufficient to cover a modern screen anymore.
Post Posted: 22 Dec 2011, 18:45
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests